Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Cherrico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 18:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Joel Cherrico

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ARTIST. He is a local artist with minimal coverage. The exception to that is his Guinness Book of World Records award, which I don't believe passes WP:ARTIST either. Kbabej (talk) 20:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. In addition to the Guiness reference, he has been featured multiple times in publications of the American Craft Council, three of which are cited in the article.  Kablammo (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not widely cited in reliable sources. No widely recognized contribution to field. Not in permanent collections. Not a part of major exhibitions. An artist of local notability with a not important Guiness World Book record. Fails WP:ARTIST.104.163.153.14 (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show he passes WP:GNG, and he clearly doesn't pass WP:ARTIST.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  16:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.