Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Isyaq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Joel Isyaq

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No appearances recorded on Playmaker Stats or on the unreliable Transfermarkt, the only two databases that seem to feature him, therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL. The only coverage found, other than brief transfer announcements, were two articles on Sportflames here and here but there is no indication that this blog is reliable. He has zero coverage outside of that one website so I believe that WP:GNG is also not met. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, agreed, fails NFOOTBALL playing only at lower tiers (American Soccer League appearances were outside of that leagues notability per WP:FPL). No other indication of GNG JW 1961   Talk  19:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable football player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nehme1499 17:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note While an individual player page is not the place for the debate - NISA is recognized and sanctioned by USSF as the same level of the pyramid as USL League One and the defensibility of including one and not the other as a notable football league is not strong. I'd caution against spending much time and effort to pursue deletion of these, when it seems far more likely that the standard will be revised. BigKennyK (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * feel free to start a discussion about the professional status of the league at WT:FPL. GiantSnowman 15:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.