Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Klaiman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Joel Klaiman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability is not inherited. No signs of being notable on his own. Amortias (T)(C) 23:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I'm not seeing anything convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  07:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Strong Keep If we start invoking inheritability re: notability for record company executives, we're going to have valid deletion arguments for half of them. I have added references to the article to the point that it may qualify as WP:OVERKILL. I will add references to the article (and clean it up/rewrite when I have some time).  There are ample sources: Billboard, Variety, Hits, New York Post, FMQB, and R&R, among others. although I'll do more digging - this is a very quick search:  Billboard (and quick google search to Billboard articles alone  Hundreds of results from Hits, including feature FMQB cover story. It still needs a rewrite/cleanup, which I will work on when I have more time.  Julie JSFarman (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has significant enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:BIO.— UY Scuti Talk  14:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 07:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. Borderline, but Variety is probably mainstream enough for this to be a good source: . I'll ping User:SwisterTwister to see if he wants to reconsider his vote? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Several of the sources on the page mention him specifically. There's still some wording to tone down and/or remove though. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.