Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel M. Greenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Joel M. Greenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOLITICIAN. Article falls foul of WP:PAID. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also awfully close to being nominated for speedy deletion as promotional. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Not notable local politician....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 19:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA&#160;<b style="color:pink">(talk)</b></i> 19:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing here to constitute notability and nothing found in a Google search to support a claim. Alansohn (talk) 22:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional article created by marketing agency for local politician with no claim to notability. AusLondonder (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Serving as a tax collector at the county level is not an WP:NPOL pass, and there's no evidence of anywhere near enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG in lieu of failing NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable politician. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete there is nothing here which meets the criteria for inclusion in an encyclopaedia. MartinJones (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.