Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Rudewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Joel Rudewicz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason: Does not meet notability requirements. Contested PROD. ponyo (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable at best, dubious or hoax at worst. Ref link provided does not work. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This should be a candidate for a speedy snow close, in my view. S. Dean Jameson 02:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete without prejudice against recreation with appropriate citations and a backed assertion of notability. Possibly snowball it  Thin  boy  00  @197, i.e. 03:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete 0 non-wiki ghits + 0 gnews hits + 0 gscholar hits = unlikely to be a world famous historian. However, it's a bit soon for a WP:SNOW close.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree. It's becoming more and more likely that this shouldn't have been prod-ed, but instead should have beeen db-hoaxed. A snow close would be well in order right now. S. Dean Jameson 14:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, and fails WP:BIO based on the information from the article. —  Wen li  (reply here) 22:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Obvious hoax. Close now under WP:SNOW. Reyk  YO!  04:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I searched on Gscholar for Rudewicz with single keywords for his subject and got no relevant hits. I therefore conclude this is WP:HOAX.  Peterkingiron (talk) 09:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.