Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joementum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Joementum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable phrase. Recent usage has no connection to Lieberman's original usage, but the current President having the same first name. Equivocation of terms separated by 14-17 years MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 22:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Politics, United States of America,  and Connecticut.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets the notability guidelines by virtue of having been documented in WP:RS used in (1) 2004, (2) 2006, (3) 2008, (4) 2020, and (5) 2023. The fact that the last two usages were for a different Joe than for the usages in 2004 and 2006 is irrelevant, as there is a clear connection. The 2008 usage is a mockery of the 2004 usage. Where is Matt? (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICT. What we have here is a portmanteau of "Joe" and "momentum" that can be applied to more than one Joe. This is a clear delete under NOTDICT which is policy. Regarding the citations given in the article, yes, these are all reliable but they are all WP:PRIMARY. See particularly WP:PRIMARYNEWS if there is any doubt about that (there shouldn't be). Per WP:BASIC, Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. So there is no notability for this term, and NOTDICT rules it out anyway. An acceptable WP:ATD would be to redirect to Joe Lieberman. Merge is not required as the mergeable content is already on that page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete -- said it better and more efficiently than I can. I would quibble on whether there is any reason to redir, however, but that idea doesn't bother me so much as it seems like a waste of time. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.