Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joesph Monti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Still not significant participation but relisting again isn't likely to change consensus. StarM 03:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Joesph Monti

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

BIO1E for a non-notable crime. Verifiable: Detroit St. Louis man kills a tavern owner in 1994 over a 38-year-old grudge. WP:RS coverage found in 1994-1995. The rest of the bio this alleged mob associate is unsourced and smacks of original research. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to Killing of Frank Parrino on the principle of cover the event rather than the person. Is there any evidence that the nightclub was notable itself? -- Eastmain (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The killing has to be notable. This one fails WP:NOT. The killing made the local papers when it happened as most crimes do, but only a passing mention since. This appears to be the settling of a low level gangland score. Little evidence of long term interest or impact. • Gene93k (talk) 05:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Otherwise, Wikipedia would be full of articles on everyday crimes. ThePointblank (talk) 06:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  01:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Hoax, bad reference and too short. I have a suspicion that it's just a recreation of a article which was AfD'd several days ago. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 07:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, no reliable citations offered for reference.Yachtsman1 (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.