Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joesph laurita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting as an unsourced BLP with an expired BLPPROD. Leave the tag up and it will be dealt with in due course. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Joesph laurita

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This biography of a living person contains no references. It was proposed for deletion on Monday, 22 February, and is overdue for deletion, which should have occurred on Monday, 29 February. Ethanlu121 (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced BLP. I'm sure the expired, uncontested prod would have been processed before long. --McGeddon (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced BLP. Couldn't find coverage in RSs. Fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete though I would've frankly waited for the BLPROD to have the article deleted (at best, articles have to wait 3 days or so sometimes when deletions aren't immediate) as there's basically nothing here for any applicable notability, nothing convincing so WP:TNT at best. SwisterTwister   talk  05:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.