Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Cutless


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Joey Cutless

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability about the subject is contested. No reliable or reputable sources give support to claims of notability in this article. Lacks verification of alleged works with celebrities in media outlets (e.g. NBC.com). All links lead nowhere except to WP and can't be used as Wikipedia references. This article should then be deleted because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. Ubot16 (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  20:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  20:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Very little coverage in reliable sources, and one of the links is dead (going to ascap.com and searching for Joey Cutless doesn't return any results). Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  20:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep References updated with live links and tested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwilson7 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comments:User "Robwilson7" appears to be a one purpose account and if not a sock of Joey Cutless himself then it should at least be noted that he emptied both the AfD deletion tag in the article and this discussion page. He was also instructed to stop inserting meaningless WP links as references (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joey_Cutless&diff=prev&oldid=587051744). Ubot16 —Preceding undated comment added 16:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I removed all the "internal" refs. That still leaves 19 non-WP refs - it's now up to the community to decide if they are reliable. Even if User:Robwilson7 is an WP:SPA or even the subject as suggested, that does not stop them adding references (provided they are good ones) - WP:COI states that COI editors can "add reliable sources"  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I have removed all the "internal" refs and baseless claims which didn't even have any external links to support them. Now you can determine for yourselves what I noticed about this article, it has no legs to run on. Ubot16 (talk) 20:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The existing refs do not discuss the subject: a requirement of notability. I cannot find any sources to support that the subject is notable. http://istandardproducers.com/interviews/new-interview-joey-cutless-tv-film/ exists, but the source does not meet WP:RS as the site appears to be designed to promote its members http://istandardproducers.com/faq/. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The references provided in the article are mostly from sources that do not meet the Wikipedia definition of reliable] and appear to be an attempt at carpet-bombing the article with references hoping something sticks. The best source out of that mess is the Cincinnati.com ite, but it's more of a community event announcement.  I cannot find any better sourcing in my own searches. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.