Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Janela (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Joey Janela
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable wrestler - editor is just copying pages from prowrestling.fandom.com - in this case https://prowrestling.fandom.com/wiki/Joey_Janela KylieTastic (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G12. Wikia content is, unless otherwise specified, available under the CC-BY-SA license.  The author of the page has not included a backlink in the form of a URL or in any way indicated that this content is copied from Wikia, so that technically makes it an unambiguous license violation and therefore falls under speedy criteria.    SITH   (talk)   20:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * it was pointed out to me earlier today that "mere lack of attribution of such works" is not enough for a speedy under WP:G12. But most of the author's other copy-paste creations have been deleted under other speedy criteria, so a speedy !vote makes sense regardless. Bakazaka (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Galatz גאליץ  שיחה Talk  19:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep — Sadly this article is in awful condition. Subject certainly meets notability guideline. ESPNDeadspin, Wrestling Observer, Fightful, Pro Wrestling Sheet, Wrestling Observer, Wrestling Observer, Pro Wrestling Sheet, and Wrestling Observer. Based on this sample of sources meets WP: ENTERTAINER and WP: GNG. STATic message me!   22:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep For the reasons Static listed. Article certainly could use more work. Janela is enough of a notable name in pro wrestling to have an article. As the articles condition goes I think we should give it a few days and come back and check to see if any progress to the article has happened -- HC7 17:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources listed by STATicVapor. Sdmarathe (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject is notable even if the article is subpar.LM2000 (talk) 06:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I nominated this 7 months ago, but I believe in the time since that has changed. -  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  18:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.