Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Krug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pantera Capital. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Joey Krug

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of this businessman does not meet WP:NBIO- lacks in-depth coverage from independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nominator words. Fade258 (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Meets WP:NBIO. Redirect to Pantera Capital . 4meter4 makes a better case for a redirect . A lot of the sources of this guy are buried under unreliable crypto news sites. However, he's received strong coverage from: Forbes (staff) ; Wired ; Business Insider ; The Wall Street Journal ; and more trivial coverage from Bloomberg, New York Times , CNBC  and Fortune .  Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale by . Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pantera Capital per WP:CHEAP and WP:ATD. Sources provided by Dr. Swag Lord are for the most part about that company anyway and not primarily about Krug. Certainly not enough to pass GNG.4meter4 (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.