Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Roach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The comment regarding Fighting Roach Brothers came too late to discuss here, consider this no consensus on that article. j⚛e deckertalk 17:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Joey Roach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer. One brother is more notable but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Having a famous brother does not give him notability.Jakejr (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the previous comments. He doesn't meet NBOX or GNG and notability is not inherited. Papaursa (talk) 02:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because if Joey get's deleted on notability grounds as already happened to Pepper the only member of this family remaining is Freddie and he already has a good article. The Fighting Roach Brothers article essentially duplicates the notable information.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.