Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Stylez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 08:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Joey Stylez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

plain promo, reverting proved useless. The Banner talk 20:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep if criteria is notability. Length, nature and tone of content is promotional and may be hard to fix. I am not a Music project member but subject appears to meet number of WP:MUSIC:
 * subject of multiple, non-trivial, published work Star Phoenix, News Optimist
 * Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style Named one of Top 25 Rappers by CBC Music
 * Has been nominated for a major award (Juno qualifies)
 * Canuckle (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep subject is clearly notable, per what Canuckle has said. Content is utter garbage.  I tried to remove some of the garbage, but it will take a lot of effort to get it to a good state.  In cases like this, we should stubify if needed, before resorting to deletion, or simply living with promotion.  --Rob (talk) 02:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - The news coverage references in the article and Juno nomination are sufficient to establish notability as a musician. I also found this from the Regina Leader-Post. -- Whpq (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.