Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Waterhouse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2005–06 Wigan Athletic F.C. season. ✗ plicit  03:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Joey Waterhouse

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Technically passes WP:NFOOTY by virtue of a two-minute appearance in a cup game, but no significant coverage to satisfy the GNG. J Mo 101 (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. J Mo 101 (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:ATH and GNG. 2A00:23C7:E915:1201:E473:B71D:61AB:8F29 (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Where is this alleged GNG coverage please? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 16:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Alternative proposal - redirect to 2005–06 Wigan Athletic F.C. season, where he is mentioned... GiantSnowman 16:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2005–06 Wigan Athletic F.C. season due to likely failure of WP:GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect is the obvious route.   scope_creep Talk  19:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect, clear GNG fail even though 2 minutes scrapes by NFOOTY. Redirecting to the season in which this happened is a reasonable alternative to outright deletion.-- Mvqr (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect, as suitable ATD. JoelleJay (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.