Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Niemann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK1 The SandDoctor  Talk 18:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Johan Niemann

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN / WP:GNG. The SandDoctor Talk 04:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:NMUSICIAN 6: [...] is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heiko Gerber (talk • contribs) 15:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per last (unsigned) comment. TheSandDoctor nominated lots of articles on Swedish/Finnish metal musicians/bands, in really short periods of time, with really short rationales and no evidence he even did a basic Google search. Even if the sourcing isn't great (which is a huge problem, I know), these musicians satisfy at least one part of notability: being part of multiple notable bands. He also seems to have gotten something against Evergrey since he nominated their members and the band themselves for deletion. But the Evergrey article was quickly kept because the nomination was nonsense. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I have nothing against the group and hadn't even heard of them until last night. A WP:BEFORE search was indeed done, which found very little in the way of sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG's "multiple, non-trivial" coverage in independent reliable sources requirement for the individual members or the albums. I am, however, willing to admit that in hindsight the nomination of the band's article itself was incorrect. Sourcing is everything and per WP:BLP if it isn't sourced it has to be removed. Withdrawing this nomination. -- The SandDoctor Talk 18:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.