Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Victor Aarne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12, copyvio Mgm|(talk) 11:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Johan Victor Aarne

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable goldsmith, a search for reliable sources related to him came up empty besides the fact that he existed. Tavix (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - to be fair to this guy, I don't know how helpful Google searches are when establishing the notability of someone who lived in Finland in the 19th century. However, I am disturbed that this blogspot article is supposedly from August 2007, and the exact same text showed up in Wikipedia in November 2007 and still exists today. Somno (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Week keep Online searches are biased here, both because of the time period and the language. Nevertheless, a few sources are available:, . And his works were included in a 2006 exhibition. Jfire (talk) 04:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, the copyright issue does seem problematic. Changing to delete, unless that's dealt with. Jfire (talk) 04:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as copyvio This is one of a large group of unsourced articles that has been added at intervals by User:Bramo, who does not seem to have not responded to  notices for previous articles.  He obviously is working from some source--possibly a history of the House--but if he is just copying the blog, it must be deleted & his others should be checked.   DGG (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G12) as a copyvio. I am assured that the original content is GFDL-compatible. MuZemike  ( talk ) 08:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.