Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan de Ridder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 13:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Johan de Ridder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable architect who fail WP:ARCHITECT and WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:ARCHITECT (3) and WP:ARCHITECT (4). Johan de Ridder played a major role in designing several significant constructions, such as the Union Buildings, which is the seat of the Government of South Africa and the President of South Africa. Krakkos (talk) 16:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The significance of de Ridder is well attested by the featured article about him on the Afrikaans Wikipedia. Krakkos (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Article needs better sourcing but this architect seems to have has a long and significant practice. MB 21:57, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Sourcing has been improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FDR89 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Agree with everyone on maintenance --Yahtolla (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of info available at Afrikaans page. Djflem (talk) 16:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.