Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johann Christian Süss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All arguments in favour of deletion, seems like, the mayhaps too quick tagging nonwithstanding. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Johann Christian Süss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Potentially fails WP:GNG Ueutyi (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep for now. I don't think that potentially interesting articles should be AfDed so soon after creation, only 7 hours. Give the creator a chance! Give advise, help, whatever. Zerotalk 09:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Possible keep -- though I would prefer this to be merged into something more general, as I am dubious of its merits. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, not seeing notability for stand alone stub. A sad trivial footnote. Kierzek (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - It is a very sad event, but it is really trivial and does not receive the appropriate coverage for a standalone article.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I'm seeing a mention of the incident in Der Spiegel (link), but this is WP:BIO1E at best. The article also presents an odd assertion that "This is clearly against the rules of war which state that no soldier in custody may be killed.[3]" The soldier was executed by the Wehrmacht, as I understand, so "no soldier in custody may be killed" does not apply. I thus recommend deleting the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.