Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johanna Jussinniemi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Johanna Jussinniemi
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nomination: the previous deletion of this article via WP:AFD; (link) was contested at WP:DELREV; (link). It was determined that this pornographic actor (actress) has received been nominated for an award that may qualify for notability per WP:PORNBIO, and therefore the pre-deletion version of the article has been restored and this AFD submitted. I have no opinion on this matter.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * More prior discussion can be found at Articles for deletion/Puma Swede. Uncle G (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Correction to Jerry's nomination Has been nominated for a minor AVN award (best startlet web-site) which is last on the list of nominations. I'm neutral on this but it was pretty clear that the question DRV felt the AFD would be helpful in deciding was whether being nominated for this award was the same as meeting PORNBIO. Over to the experts.... Spartaz Humbug! 22:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank-you for that correction, Spartaz. I will correct the nomination statement accordingly.  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:N per the multiple reliable sources. The Web Starlet Of The Year nomination is enough to pass WP:PORNBIO, despite the category being last in alphabetical order. Epbr123 (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Unless its AVN you are referring to I'm not sure I'm seeing multiple independant reliable sources to meet N. Is AVN really considered a RS? Spartaz Humbug! 00:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, AVN is a trade journal with sufficient editorial oversight. Epbr123 (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The award nomination seems to satisfy notability, and moreover the references in this article have recently been substantially improved. TotientDragooned (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, as said by others, the article meets the notability criteria. Article should be renamed to her artistic name "Puma Swede" though. -- fdewaele, 30 December 2008, 12:38 (CET).
 * Delete. No reasonable claim of notability is in the article. She has been nominated for an "award." But the link goes to a list of "nominees" that is 55 pages long and lists more than 300 different female performers for a single year. (My count leaves out multiple nominations for the same performer.) We do not treat such indiscriminate "honors" as conferring notability in any other field. There is no reason to do so here. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies WP:PORNBIO criteria. Sharveet (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep passes both general and the Pornbio additional criteria. Hullaballoo's bizarre assertions to the contrary, the AVN award has been held to meet the criteria for a substantial length of time.Horrorshowj (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.