Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johanna Krawczyk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Lennart97 (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Johanna Krawczyk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NAUTHOR. I can't find any significant coverage of her, or of her only novel. The current sources (her publisher's website and a blog) aren't nearly sufficient. Lennart97 (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete the only review is a blog. fails WP:GNG and, as per nom, NAUTHOR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Her novel has been reviewed in Wukali, which appears to be a reliable source, and by RTBF which is definitely a reliable source. It also appears to have been shortlisted for the Prix de la Closerie des Lilas. pburka (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * These seem to be decent sources, but I do think two sources is still pretty thin overall, especially for a biography when the sources are both book reviews; neither provides any biographical information about the author. Lennart97 (talk) 20:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * They're sufficient to demonstrate notability of her book (and there seem to be more, but my French is rusty and I didn't feel like sorting through more hits). We could rename the article to Avant elle, however I prefer articles about authors over articles about their books: see Sole authors of notable books for my rationale. pburka (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand. But as it stands, we have exactly zero reliably sourced biographical information on the author, and without that, we can't have a BLP, I think. I do see that the book passes NBOOK, so an article about Avant elle is possible, although it's not unlikely that article would, as you describe it, languish as stub-class article indefinitely :) Lennart97 (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Other sources are available to support a brief biography. These aren't sufficiently independent to support notability, but I think they're acceptable for sourcing non-controversial biographical facts: "Contributors" in Aesthetics and Ideology in Contemporary Literature and Drama, "Présentation des auteurs" at Université de la Réunion, her doctoral thesis, and her publisher's website. pburka (talk) 22:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work on the article. I'm happy to withdraw my nomination at this point, if agrees. Lennart97 (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Fine by me ... :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.