Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Wahlström


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  A  Train talk 12:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Johannes Wahlström

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Falling WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR Shrike (talk) 10:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shrike (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shrike (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - AfD is not a clean-up service. Simple google search came up with plenty of references to confirm notability. This articles subject is within WP:GNG. That the article needs a lot of work is not a reason for deletion.BabbaQ (talk) 11:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Its only name drops as far as I checked.--Shrike (talk) 11:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - it's always tricky to establish the notability of journalists as they become famous by writing, and we can't easily evaluate notability from a person's own writings. However, Wahlström is well-known both in Sweden (and he's all over their major newspapers) and abroad (e.g. in Norway), not least for Wikileaks, as this Guardian article shows. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I think this is passable; the subject has a sv.wiki article which is indicative of notability as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.