Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Xingan Li


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Johannes Xingan Li

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Random academic; cited only to employer and to their own papers. Additionally, most of the page is copyvio of those papers. Pinkbeast (talk) 02:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:Prof unless something can be found in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:Prof, also total lack of independent sources. - MrOllie (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. We don't have evidence of passing any criterion of WP:PROF. And the way the article is written by copying the abstracts of his publications into it makes it looks like there is so little to say about him that filler was needed. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:PROF.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.