Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Aber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW. No use in dragging this out. Nom should familiarize themselves with WP:ACADEMIC. Randykitty (talk) 12:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

John Aber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Person is not notable.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  06:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

I've added more information about this well-known ecologist. Please check again. Thanks - JocelynTalk to me 12:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jocelyndurrey (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep per WP:PROF (holds a "University Professor" title, meaning that UNH thinks he's among their best four professors) and #C1 (Google scholar profile lists five publications with over 1000 citations, an order of magnitude more than what I would expect to meet this standard). —David Eppstein (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Conclusive Keep. To add from WoS; >140 papers with citation counts 2440, 1480, 1410, 847....(h-index 80) conclusively passes WP:PROF c1. It would be good form for nom to withdraw this AfD to save the valuable time of other eds and I'd like to suggest nom adhere to WP:BEFORE in the future. Thanks! Agricola44 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Snowball Keep: Besides his notability, which the previous commenters have already proven, I'd just like to note that the article meets the rest of the other criteria for keeping that I can think of, as well, such as referencing and content. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Eppstein. I also do not understand the nomination.  The Indian culture of self-promotion makes it difficult to assess Indian academics (who have a tendency to overstate credentials), but not American ones (who generally don't). Le petit fromage (talk) 10:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.