Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Abisch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

John Abisch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP. The subject appears to fail WP:BIO, but I am having trouble telling if this is a complete hoax or just if there is a dearth of sources. The article is based on a copy/paste Phillip Frost, and the sources in-article have been renamed to appear to support statements in the article when they do not. I removed the faulty sources and they were restored by an IP; rather than edit war over a BLP PROD I think it would be preferable to take the same 7 days establishing notability so any recreations can be deleted as recreations if this person is indeed not notable. VQuakr (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  01:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  01:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * delete It's not utterly a hoax, as I was able to verify the there is a John Abisch who was president of Econocaribe Consolidators at some point. I'm not convinced that this is sufficient notability. Everything else in the article seems unsupported if not just plain wrong. At present even if the article were kept everything would have to be deleted except one sentence which isn't entirely correct even then. Mangoe (talk) 14:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment an IP who is probably the article creator has repeatedly blanked the article. My interpretation of this is that they now understand that the subject does not meet our inclusion criteria. If an admin reviews this article, can you please consider closing it as delete based on the 2 !votes and the creator's requested G7? VQuakr (talk) 20:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.