Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Adidam Littlejohn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

John Adidam Littlejohn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable Musician. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Has a little local interest coverage but nothing significant. Current overly promotional article is bombarded with sources but there is a lack of sufficient good ones. Primary sources, shops, show listings, PR, passing mentions. His releases are not on an "important" label. He lacks charting, sales, major award. Nothing notable in this advert duffbeerforme (talk) 07:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * delete not notable enough Daniel kenneth (talk[&section=new + ]·[ tag]·contribs ·deleted contribs ·[ logs]·[ filter log] ·block user ·[ block log]·SUL·CA·[ checkuser] ([ log])) 14:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches are finding nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.