Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Andelin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 14:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

John Andelin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

For the record I actually created this article. I have since come to realize we need stricter controls on Wikipedia content. There is just no evidence that Andelin is widely recognized for his work at a level that would make him a nottable sculptor. 2 of the sources are essentially his website and an add source. The Mormon Times article was written by the LDS Public affiars rep in his stake, and thus has lots of conflict of interest points. The LDS Church News article might go for something, but to establish him as a notable scultor I think we would need more than at best 2 articles about him. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I concur like with the other ones here, there's nothing here given there's only 1 trivial published book, and other trivial achievements at that, hence nothing meaningfully significant. SwisterTwister   talk  07:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.