Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Barker (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

John Barker (writer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Problematic substub claims the subject was a defendant in a notable trial and subsequently became a writer. No reliable sourcing, basically no content except material that relates directly to the claim of a criminal record. Might be rescue-worthy if it checks out with reliable sourcing, but without sourcing it's a serious BLP problem. Durova 311 20:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, hardly any reliable sources for John Barker. The lack of citations, among other things, makes this article a BLP violation. –blurpeace (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  13:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.