Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bevir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No arguments to keep - treating as an uncontested PROD Kevin (talk) 03:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

John Bevir

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. ƒ(Δ)² 08:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to ITV Tyne Tees & Border or delete. Article is an unsourced BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.