Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Boessenecker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

John Boessenecker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources are generally self-written pieces that have been posted on sales cites or other such puff areas. Nothing in here shows him to be Notable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  01:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  01:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. An author whose books have been reviewed in The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and has received an award from a notable writers' professional organization can safely be presumed notable even if the sourcing for a particular version of the article is lousy. Nominator should review WP:BEFORE before nominating any more pages for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep – References in the New York Times, USA Today, Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times to name just a few and shown here clearly meets our current guidelines. ShoesssS Talk 14:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep because there is enough notability but search more independent and authoritative sources. Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.