Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Brougher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7, I don't see an assertion of actual notability here. Also borderline g11 self-promotion. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

John Brougher

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not see any evidence of notability in the sources; nor, based on the career, is there any reason to suspect that there would be.  DGG ( talk ) 19:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG. No evidence of notability in the sources provided. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete reads like it was copy-pasted from his resume. You know an article is getting desperate to find something to say about the subject when it starts getting into what kind of movies they like. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.