Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cacavas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 00:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

John Cacavas
Not notable


 * Merge into Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories, or possibly Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories soundtrack. Not enough to warrant an individual article. I quote: "John Cacavas has written other material, but not much is known about him." &laquo; Lord  ViD  &raquo; 10:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Actually, quite a bit is known about Cacavas and his other works. He recently published his autobiography. I have made some changes. His stature is comparable to Christophe Beck, Christopher Franke, Dennis McCarthy, or W.G. Walden all of whom have written music for seminal television shows.

I am relisting this to generate more discussion. --Angr (t·c) 17:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep IMDB lists 70 composer credits and 1 conductor credit, which is pretty good. He also has a Four Freedoms Foundation George Washington Honor award, whatever that is. I'd say reasonably notable. Silly Dan 23:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Relisting again to generate more discussion.  Rob e  rt  01:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. VegaDark 01:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Silly Dan.--SarekOfVulcan 03:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Very minor figure, but notable enough for WP. The sad thing is that GTA is listed as his chief credit.  Welcome to Wikipedia! If he had only composed something for Star Trek, the article would be at 1500 words right now. Eusebeus 19:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Volatile 05:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as mentioned above, if he had something to do with Star Trek or Family Guy the page would be a mile long. Steve-O 19:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed, sufficiently noteworthy.Meekohi 19:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.