Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Carmack describes the fight for Doom 3

John Carmack describes the fight for Doom 3
Consists entirely of one entry of John Carmack's .plan file. Non-encyclopedic. (I could easily fill up VFD with items from Special:Deadendpages, and I try not to, but this one really stood out.) - KeithTyler 23:52, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-encyclopedic. Geogre 00:14, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: questionable copyright status, non-encyclopedic. ugen64 01:05, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * It does not have questionable copyright status, the email is fair use, having said that Delete this, put the text in the doom3 article and the email on wikisource and link to it. -- Ævar Arnfjörð [ Bjarmason]   07:45, 2004 Sep 21 (UTC)
 * For the record, the text is not an email. See finger protocol. - KeithTyler
 * I forgot that John Carmack is one of three people alive still using finger, thanks for the reminder. -- Ævar Arnfjörð [ Bjarmason]   20:10, 2004 Sep 21 (UTC)
 * Move to wikisources. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:32, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - do not wikisource - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  15:33, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do not wikisource, they don't need it either. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:40, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not wikisource. Concur with Bjarmason. --Improv 19:15, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Frankly, I could see putting a history of Carmack's .plan file on Wikisource, but not just one by itself. That's assuming that Carmack intends his .plan texts to be freely redistributed. - KeithTyler 19:18, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do not put on Wikisource.  And even if it isn't an email, emails are NOT fair use -- the originator is the sole owner of the email.  RickK 20:07, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Who cares?  Not notable enough for either Wikipedia or Wikisource and a probable copyvio anyway. Gamaliel [[Image:Watchmensmiley20.gif]] 22:01, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic. Andris 23:17, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)