Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cervenka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus to delete, but added refimprove template to article. Davewild (talk) 11:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

John Cervenka

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability problems; while I can find some references to John Cervenka in searches, they are only ever passing mentions in articles about MXC or a few one-episode parts he's played in sitcoms. Though he did seem to host Love Connection and Burt Luddin's Buffet, I can't find anything else about it.  Pirate  Mink  08:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions.   —User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 14:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject really does not have any presence on the searches that I ran. As noted above, passing mention at best for this comedian/actor. --Stormbay (talk) 22:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article doesn't mention it (yet), but Cervenka and other MXC people are alumni of the Groundlings.  Borderline notability but my vote is, let's keep it to be conservative.  --Lockley (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 13:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, seems to have scattered claims of notability but I think he might pass WP:N -- one major role as announcer, one as game show host, and a handful of bit parts, plus a background as one of the Groundlings. Could stand to be sourced though. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I have a feeling that this article is not sourced in any meaningful way because no one is finding material. It can be kept and left inadequately sourced, if that is the consensus. Stormbay (talk) 22:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.