Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Charles Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom hasn't done any searches beforehand thus not following WP:BEFORE - All have been nominated within seconds of each other so closing as SK (This should've been closed weeks ago so not sure why it never was....) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

John Charles Price

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe Circuit judges in England and Wales are de facto notable individuals. There are over 600 of these and they rank below high court judges. Uhooep (talk) 10:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: I don't believe all Circuit judges in England and Wales are de facto notable individuals, however Charles has an entry in Who's Who which suggests he is particulrly notable. Wikipedia does not put a numerical restriction on how many notable circuit judges it allows. Graemp (talk) 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as despite the comment above, several of these have been deleted as it is and recovering all of these simply for better analysis would be unnecessary especially considering AfD itself. Delete and Move to Draft at best if needed, SwisterTwister   talk  05:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.