Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Clark (actor/director)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

John Clark (actor/director)
Pure WP:AUTO - identical to creator's user page. All his edits have been to this or to Lynn Redgrave, his ex-wife --Jamoche 07:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable bio. Kevin 08:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A good haircut could turn this into a worthy encyclopedic article. If he is non-notable then there are countless thousands of current similar bio entries in Wiki that need the axe as well. One man's meat......Moriori 09:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:AUTO and WP:VANITY. There may be scope for a proper  article on this man, but a self-written promo piece is not the way to start. --User:BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 13:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Quoting the very page you link to: "vanity by itself is not a basis for deletion". &mdash; Haeleth Talk 15:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've scraped this article with a NPOV comb, and would argue that while some more citations are needed, notability is asserted in spades. He was William, after all! Colon el Tom 14:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. Vanity is not a basis for deletion.  Edit out anything unverifiable, POV, or based on original research, and keep the rest, in accordance with the actual policies and principles on which Wikipedia is founded.  &mdash; Haeleth Talk
 * Keep Notable enough, IMDB bio shows a significant body of film and TV work. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above. Stifle (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for the above reasons. -- DS1953 talk 01:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I've "cleaned it up" by removing items that might be deemed controversial. Any so considered can be found in my website, which I have just updated with archival footage from British Pathe. Please don't delete all of this entry, I think it belongs here in Wilkipedia.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.