Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cornet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

John Cornet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. After wading through dozens of pages of Google hits, mostly sites selling his self-published book, I can't find anything that shows he is notable. Also fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. Valfontis (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero evidence of notability, and I can't find anything via Google to help the situation. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  17:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Valfontis (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources that come up after a Google search are without a doubt either off-topic or not reliable . Not much here, either, so this article clearly violates the first criterion at WP:GNG. Jsayre64   (talk)  03:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After some searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources about this author. Northamerica1000 (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BIO, WP:N, WP:RS. Qworty (talk) 06:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this person.  Gongshow  Talk 06:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet our notability guidelines.  This conversation is worthy of a snow IMHO.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.