Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Daker

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:51, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

John Daker

 * Delete nn internet phenomenon. Don't see much how this could become encylopedic. Friday 23:10, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup So very sad, but a) true and b) Google indicates that it has indeed become something of a cult item.... sigh. If my delete vote counted for the Net at large, then I'd change my vote. -Harmil 23:54, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, and much of the article approaches original research. I think we've reached the point in Intarweb history where "Video of Guy Embarrasing Himself" is pretty commonplace, no matter how hilarious. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  01:11, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup and expand. I'm with Harmil on this, as sadly, he is somewhat of a popular pheonomina. Wait a few months, then re-VfD (set yourself a reminder or something). -mysekurity 01:20, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly verifiable. If a user were to look up the name on Wikipedia, it would be remiss to allow them to find a redlink. Merging with a broader article on Internet embarrassments would be an alternative. Grace Note 01:24, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable phenomenon. JamesBurns 08:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 15:05, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup. I don't think Daker is any more or less and internet phenomenon than Star Wars kid or the various other memes on Wiki. IrishGuy
 * Keep Internet notability is fine with me.--Simon.Pole 22:11, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Category 01:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expand.
 * Delete. Do we really need/want an article on everything that ever showed up in the news or in the net? Is WP a jokes site? - Nabla 03:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just as worthy as Star Wars kid to be on wikipedia. -- Crevaner 00:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.