Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Daker (singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete CSD-G3.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  12:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

John Daker (singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

this was CSD:a7, but I think it didn not qualify, so I deleted it. Moving it to AFD to see what the community thinks. tosh.0 giving web redemption might be notable. shrug. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that there is just enough to cross the speedy deletion line, but this looks like a pretty classic WP:BLP1E to me.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BLP1E and something that Tosh.0 may do in the future do not meet our notability guidelines. EricSerge (talk) 03:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As above, and a "web redemption" does not equal notability. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet our notability guidelines. Sparthorse (talk) 06:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a CSD:G3 hoax. The reference for the quote is to "Statemaster Encyclopedia" which is a Wikipedia mirror site that does not have an article on John Daker. The YouTube video is an obvious fake (the reaction shots are cut from several different American Idol broadcasts, there is no evidence that Daker was an American Idol contestant) and the Tosh.0 speculation is completely unsourced. I don't believe a word of the article. At the least its an unsourced WP:BLP, fails WP:BIO and WP:BLP1E and is not WP:V Sparthorse (talk) 06:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3 As per Sparthorse.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  11:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is the original footage I'll go ahead and delete the article...  Catfish   Jim  and the soapdish  11:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.