Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John David Whalen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

John David Whalen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unmistakably promotional, and fails WP:NACTOR. Possible undisclosed paid contributions. – Ploni (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ploni (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The Baltimore Sun article seems notable, can't find much else though... He was in the John Glenn movie, if he was the star, that would seem to make him notable. I can't do a deep dive at this time for it, however. Oaktree b (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * John Glenn appears to be a very minor character in the film (not mentioned in the film's article, for instance), and not significant enough to satisfy the first criterion of WP:NACTOR. The Sun article is a local interest story (Whalen is from Baltimore), and I haven't been able to find significant coverage elsewhere. –Ploni (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivial role. Oaktree b (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete a local interest story and minor roles do not notability make.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.