Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dehlin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

John Dehlin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self promotion, subject authored, fails GNG and WP:BIO Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;Between the TEDx talk and the NYTimes article I don't think notability is an issue here. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 05:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cartographies.  GNG is clearly met.  Darmokand (talk) 11:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep There is no question about notability as demonstrated by the good sources. Sanpitch (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Notability is without question. This is a good article.-- Man way  18:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not seeing where this fails GNG/Notability. This delete request is one of four requested by u|Tkfy7cf that focus on removing well-cited articles of notable people / organisations that seem to be out of favor with the LDS / Mormon church. Stesmo (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.