Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dingfelder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

John Dingfelder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local politician that fails WP:POLITICIAN. Most cited coverage is that he was running or run of the mill candidate profiles. Relatively little significant coverage about him as an actual individual. Reads more like a resume. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Came across this page from BLPN. Page is promotional and subject does not meet general notability requirements. Most coverage is only local. Meatsgains (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I also saw this at BLPN. The article is unsourced, promotional, and based on the available evidence here the subject does not seem notable. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete city councilors are not default notable. We need more sources to show notability. We need way more than a open source website that seeks articles on all political candidates.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks notability as a city councilor. Tampa would not meet the "city of international prominence" for municipal pols that suggests as a rule of thumb on WP:NPOL. Additionally, WP:NOTRESUME and lacks any sources backing up claims. Could possibly be G11'd Bkissin (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. As large and significant as Tampa is, it is still not a global city for the purposes of being able to make its city councillors notable enough for articles just for the fact of serving as city councillors per se. He could still clear the bar if something genuinely substantive and reliably sourced could be written about his political career which demonstrated credible evidence (eg. nationalizing coverage) that he was a special case over and above most other city councillors — but this, as written, is not so much an encyclopedia article as it is an unsourced "meet your councillor" blurb of the type one would expect to see on the city council's own self-published website. The key to getting a city councillor over the "special case" bar does not hinge on being able to primary-source his pre-politics career and volunteer backgrounds, because every city councillor always has career and community involvement backgrounds and a primary-source profile on the city council's website — it hinges on being able to reliably source genuinely substantive content about his work on the city council. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It was correctly listed on Jan 9. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 13:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.