Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Douillard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

John Douillard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A poorly sourced BLP which is somewhat promotonal in tone. There does not appear to be any mainstream coverage of this subject consistent with what we require for a biography of a living person. All of the sources that we do have are somewhat within the "fringe bubble", and insufficient to establish the kind of broader notability we require. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG's significant coverage, as far as I can tell. - HyperGaruda (talk) 18:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Alexbrn (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - probably passes WP:FRINGE. His books and Nooks are available at my employer's website, Barnes and Noble. Bearian (talk) 22:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches didn't show they pass WP:GNG, and they certainly don't pass WP:NAUTHOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.