Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dwyer (professor) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Obvious copyvio, thanks User:David Eppstein tedder (talk) 00:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

John Dwyer (professor)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like a resumé; no indication of meeting the WP:PROF or WP:BIO notability criteria. Contested PROD.  Sandstein  11:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete quite obviously CV puff, not even in article form let alone worthy of being kept as one. Establishes no claim of notability other that being a professor, and lacks sufficient references. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like an WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - No list of published works, published research projects, or anything establishing notablity -- a few administrative positions do not a notable professor make. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 15:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — While I do not believe this is WP:AUTOBIO (the original editor does not have the same name as this page), it clearly fails WP:BIO. Further, the other article relating to notability, Dwyer Function has been deleted. Tpk5010 (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for ample reasons given in first AfD. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC).
 * Speedy delete as a copyvio (WP:CSD#G12) of http://www.roehampton.ac.uk/staff/JohnDwyer/. So tagged. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.