Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Englart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex / Rational 14:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

John Englart

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBIO. The majority of sources are primary or don't provide significant coverage. There is only one source that contributes to notability. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Websites,  and Australia. GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Politics,  and Internet.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 *  Delete  - agree that the Herald Sun / Moreland Leader source is the only one contributing to notability - this is insufficient for establishing wider notability. Combined with the primary sources, it is overall insufficient at this time to merit inclusion. WmLawson (talk) 23:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

•	*Delete. A lot of primary sources; many are self-published - fails WP:BIO. Includes partisan commentary – fails WP:NPOV. Consider adding mention to 1998 Australian waterfront dispute depending on sources. Spinifex&#38;Sand (talk) 23:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG standards and sources are minor, partisan or questionable. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 18:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.