Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Eriksson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 01:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

John Eriksson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

BLPPROD was removed (by author) so cant re-add. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG and not even referenced → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions 13:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment – You could have restored the BLPPROD & warned the user with  seeing as he didn't add any references before removing. It's not the same as an ordinary PROD the user must add a reference before removing. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep the article needs to be cleaned up, of course, and cited, but Eriksson is notable enough to have his own article, I think. Sarah (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: An unreferenced BLP. As this is an article about a person, it should be sourced no matter what. If he is found to be notable according to Wikipedia guidelines, I will still support deletion if the article isn't referenced. SL93 (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep: Per Colapeninsula's work. SL93 (talk) 16:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I added some refs (I didn't check Swedish sources though). He's been involved in a lot of projects outside Peter Bjorn and John.  The article does need a lot of work, though, even with simple things like formatting. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - This topic passes WP:GNG, per:
 * Goodman, William (October 26, 2010.) "Peter, Bjorn, & John's New 'Pure Pop Rock' Album." Spin Magazine.
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 14:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 14:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.