Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Etnier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

John Etnier

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Recent discussions regarding minimal notability, the creator requested deletion and blanked - there has been almost nothing added by anyone else it appeared to be a case of speedy G-7 author blanking - the only real content added or altered by someone other than the creator/blanker appears to be these two phrasesbut User:Stephen rejected the speedy, so here we are, I think its time for bed for this low notabiliy weakly cited BLP. Off2riorob (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * weak delete - none of the current sources appear to meet the WP:RS standards. The google news search appears to provide only passing coverage in local papers mentioning that Etnier is performing but no reviews or commentary or discussion about him/his work. google books provides several hits for a John Etnier who was apparently somehow involved in the civil war, (but I dont think that is this person) and a few listings of Etnier in production credits, but again I found nothing substantial. I could have missed something as my google-foo has been really off lately, thus the "weak".Active  Banana    (bananaphone  18:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Claims to notability are pretty weak. In edge cases like these, if the subject of the article wants to delete the article, I say delete it.  &mdash;SW&mdash; confer 00:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.