Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John G. Edelman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

John G. Edelman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Though the person is the CEO of a company that has their own Wikipedia article, the references listed in this article do not suggest that the subject meets GNG.  CatcherStorm    talk   17:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC) I wish I was paid for this article... Simply filled in basic information about the CEO of a company. I am trying to begin articles for large companies in the design industry, I am new to it and would appreciate help rather than immediate dismissal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnEditorNameA (talk • contribs) 20:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Promo article by an extremely obvious paid editor who hasn't declared their Conflict of Interest. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You're creating articles for one specific company and its employees. That's not how a new editor typically behaves, and your actions in disrupting the deletion process of your other articles do not indicate that you're here to improve Wikipedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete It also doesn't help your case that the pictures of the employees are pictures you claim to own and have personally released the copyright of, which most "new and unconnected editors" wouldn't say. (here and here) GabetheEditor (talk cont ) 23:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like something that belongs on Linked-in. Subject is CEO of a business unit of a larger corporation. Not sufficient for WP:NBIO. MB 02:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet GNG or NBIO. Article creator now at COIN. Meters (talk) 08:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NBIO and only shows ]]WP:ROUTINE]] coverage. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A two-sentence vanity article written for a CEO does not belong on Wikipedia ever. - Brianhe (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: no indication of notability by our standards, regardless of the possible COI. I agree with that the upload of an image taken on 13 June 2011 looks at first like evidence of a direct and long-established connection; but I think it's really just a common-or-garden copyright violation, so I've nominated that image for speedy deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. hopelessly contaminated by paid editing. If there is any actual notability, the only course would be to start over.  DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.