Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John G. Messerly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  09:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

John G. Messerly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Have tried to find more sources per WP:BEFORE, and article appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Agreed, fails NACADEMIC, GNG. South Nashua (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * weak Keep. several books, but by relatively minor publishers.  DGG ( talk ) 05:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 29 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 22:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete several books alone is not enough to pass academic notability for a philosopher. Writing books is what philosophers do, and there is no evidence that his works have made a major impact.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found one review of his Piaget book but it's not enough for WP:AUTHOR and the citation record, while not conclusive for this subject, also doesn't provide any help via WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.