Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John G. Wollaston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Akirn (talk) 16:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

John G. Wollaston

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Conspiracy theorist of no apparent notability. No sign in GNews; all sources are to YouTube or some conspiracy site. I also see no notability for his practice as an architect. Not to be confused with the painter John Wollaston. Mangoe (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Itsmejudith (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Publisher seems non-notable. Of course I only say this because I am part of the world wide conspiracy to suppress all knowledge of his work. Paul B (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, No reliable sources that are independent of the subject... both the YouTube link and the website source seem to be self-published by the subject himself (and focused primarily on selling the subject's book. WP:NOT advertisement.) Blueboar (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reliable sources write about him, and his books were self-published.. Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 19:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I think this is a great business model for self-publishing authors. Write about conspiracies, and then blame the evil forces behind the putative conspiracy for the low sales of your book.  Classic, absolutely classic.   ''Em-jay-es  04:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.