Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Grigsby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

John Grigsby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN author, fails the GNG and all elements of WP:AUTHOR. No sign of significant coverage, at least once one has winnowed out the same-named political activist, economist, basketball player, bassist, forty-niner ... (By the bye, for those overzealous deprodders out there, "significant coverage" does mean "significant coverage." It does not mean namedrops.)  Notability tagged for over a decade.   Ravenswing     15:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  15:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  15:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment nothing found in Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, or Gale Literature (including Contemporary Authors). --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The amount of other people who need to be sorted out is somewhat surprising. This person seems to have some fringe ideas about Beowulf, and there is no evidence that these ideas have been accepted as mainstream, or have had any impact on other scholars. So he fails the academic notability as well as the writer notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm unable to find any convincing evidence of notability. ~Kvng (talk) 22:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Johnpacklambert. --Kbabej (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.